I haven’t tried it, but if Julia recommends it then it must be good. INSERT INTO Articoli(CodArt, DesArt, CodFamiglia) VALUES ( 'ART003', 'ART. 003', 'FAM02' ) This is Visual Studio extension recommended by the EF Guru, Julia Lerman, in one of her MSDN magazine articles.INSERT INTO Articoli(CodArt, DesArt, CodFamiglia) VALUES ( 'ART002', 'PRODOTTO PROVA', 'FAM01' ).INSERT INTO Articoli(CodArt, DesArt, CodFamiglia) VALUES ( 'ART001', 'ARTICOLO TEST', 'FAM01' ).(50) NOT NULL ,Īfter you create the tables, fill them with some data.) WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF , STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF , IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF , ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON , ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON ) ON.
#Can you use entity framework with visual studio for macos code
We can say that the two approaches, beyond some instrumental peculiarity, represent a kind of index of priorities compared to those in power in determining the structure of the data, with which the Application will have to do "before the database" ( from which they derived classes) or "before the" code (from which a data base model can be textured). It is not necessary that Code-First is obliged to work initially in the absence of the database as we can model the classes of an existing database and connect to it to perform the usual operations of I / OR. The difference between the two approaches is obvious from their name as with Database-First, we find ourselves in a position, where we have to model a pre-existing database (and therefore, to derive from it our objects), while in the Code-mode First, we will have to prepare by giving them the properties representing the table fields to determine the structure of the database. They are Database-First and Code-First (the first being absent from EF7, but still valid up to version 6.1.3).
At present, EF mainly allows two types of approaches related to this use.
0 kommentar(er)
